tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35978226.post2536384213877286626..comments2007-11-01T11:40:35.942-07:00Matthewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09241763399522756045noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35978226.post-35190499819517111442007-11-01T11:40:00.000-07:002007-11-01T11:40:00.000-07:002007-11-01T11:40:00.000-07:00it's possible, but the same thing happened with Wynn. Named the starter, took the majority, and was just too inconsistent to be a fantasy starter.<BR/><BR/>Grant may be the starter, but he could be a tough one to callPoEthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09241763399522756045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35978226.post-12581817539353039262007-10-31T20:44:00.000-07:002007-10-31T20:44:00.000-07:002007-10-31T20:44:00.000-07:00I agree Grant may not be a fantasy starter going forward and he's in the same position as others in GB but who do you think will ultimately be the primary back for the Packers? <BR/> <BR/>The fact Grant put up 104 yards, Wynn was lost for the season to injury and Morency/Jackson can't stay healthy makes him the defacto starter in the near term.Johnhttp://ffcollective.comnoreply@blogger.com